Biofuel Watch - Alternative Fuels Don’t Benefit the Military - New report
New York Times: January 25, 2011
The United States would derive no meaningful military benefit from increased use of alternative fuels to power its jets, ships and other weapons systems, according to a government-commissioned study by the RAND Corporation scheduled for release Tuesday.
The report also argued that most alternative-fuel technologies were unproven, too expensive or too far from commercial scale to meet the military's needs over the next decade.
In particular, the report argued that the Defense Department was spending too much time and money exploring experimental biofuels derived from sources like algae or the flowering plant camelina, and that more focus should be placed on energy efficiency as a way of combating greenhouse gas emissions.
...
The analysis has irked environmental groups and biofuels proponents, who argued that RAND had underestimated the commercial viability of algae and overestimated the availability and efficacy of carbon capture and storage technology.
Full story at http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/25/business/energy-environment/25fuel.html.
----------------------------------------------
Brian Tokar
Institute for Social Ecology
P.O. Box 93
Plainfield, VT 05667
www.social-ecology.org
* My 2 new books:
http://www.akpress.org/2010/items/towardclimatejustice
http://www.monthlyreview.org/books/agriculturefood.php
------------------------------------




No comments:
Post a Comment
Biofuels are a wide range of fuels which are in some way derived from biomass.
Your idea?