Wednesday, March 4, 2015

Re: [biofuelwatch] New Biofuewatch briefing about the White Rose “CCS” project





Betockvoices is committed in saving this rain forests and supporting local farmers to independently cultivate their lands. Palm oil projects stories are full of corruption, intimidation, human rights abuses, and environmental destruction with false promises of employment and development projects for the local communities. To speed up this disastrous deforestation, the palm oil barons are looking forward to their windfall from their Timber sales and are ready to fire up the chainsaws again. Please join us in speaking out against this insanity! Read more: http://betockvoices.page.tl/The-Voice-of-the-Voiceless.htm


On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:11 AM, almuth@ernsting.wanadoo.co.uk [biofuelwatch] <biofuelwatch-noreply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 


Why it may never capture carbon and why public subsidies should not be spent on Drax's new "White Elephant" coal power plant: http://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk/2015/white-rose-briefing/


Summary:


The White Rose Project by Drax, Alstom and BOC is a new coal power station (possibly to be co-fired with biomass) next to Drax's existing coal and biomass power station, for which a planning application has already been submitted. The White Rose plant would be capable of capturing carbon but it could technically be run more efficiently and cheaply as a conventional coal power plant without any CCS. National Grid is currently considering whether to invest in infrastructure to transport CO2 from the White Rose site and to pump it underneath the North Sea, but these considerations and any possible planning application associated with them are entirely separate from the planning application for the White Rose plant.

Nonetheless, the project is one of just two 'preferred bidders' for a £900 million capital grant from DECC and the developers have already received £50 million from DECC for a feasibility study. DECC also expects the project to attract a Green Investment Bank loan. If the plant was built and run with CCS, it would be eligible for annual subsidies (Contract for Difference) and for a up to €300 million from the European Commission.

However, running it without CCS may prove to be more lucrative. No other country in the world is investing in a scheme like the White Rose project. The technology for capturing carbon this way has already been tested and shown to be too expensive and inefficient to be commercially viable. Only a technological breakthrough could change this situation. Major public funding for a technology which two large energy firms have tested and dismissed as commercially unviable will not make CCS any more commercially viable; it will merely increase the demand for coal and potentially for wood pellets, as well as increasing CO2 emissions from coal mining, from logging and forest degradation (if wood pellets are co-fired) and from the new power plant's smokestack since, at the very most, only 90% of CO2 can be captured, with no guarantee of any being captured at all.





__._,_.___

Posted by: Betockvoices The Farmers <betockvoices@gmail.com>



__,_._,___

My Privacy...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Biofuels are a wide range of fuels which are in some way derived from biomass.

Your idea?