Sunday, October 26, 2014

[biofuelwatch] Fwd: Group concerned about renewables' (biomass, hydro) & wildlife

OPINION: Renewable Energies - a Double-Edged Sword
By Bradnee Chambers, Executive Secretary of the UNEP Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals

BONN, Oct 25 2014 (IPS) - The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change has set a target of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases such as CO2. One way countries can meet their obligations is to switch energy production from the burning of fossil fuels to "renewables", generally understood to include wind, wave, tidal, hydro, solar and geothermal power and biomass. 
They have a dual advantage: first, they do not create by-products responsible for global warming and climate change; and secondly, they are non-consumptive, drawing on primary energy sources that are to all intents and purposes inexhaustible.

Why then is the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS), which is holding its triennial policy conference next month in Quito, Ecuador, rocking the boat by publishing a review <<>>highlighting the serious environmental threats posed by the new technologies?

First and foremost, CMS is not joining the climate sceptics' camp. There is ample evidence of the effects climate change is having on migratory animals.

The Convention has long been grappling with this issue. The Convention and the vulnerable species it protects need climate change to be halted or at least slowed down so that adaptation measures can be developed.

Climate change just adds to the threats migratory species currently face. This includes threats posed by the fishing gear responsible for by-catch of seabirds, turtles and dolphins; and the demand for luxury products that result in the wasteful practice of shark finning and the fuelling of the massacre of elephants and rhinos for ivory and horn. And then there is marine debris, bird poisoning and illegal trapping - the list goes on.

Climate change is opening several new fronts in the conservation war by causing habitat change and loss; by affecting gender ratios in species such as marine turtles; and by altering species' behaviour with some not migrating at all, others leaving their breeding grounds later and returning earlier, while some are extending their range displacing other species less capable of adapting.
So why is CMS not rejoicing at the news that wave energy installations, tidal barrages, solar panels and wind farms on land and at sea are being developed at unprecedented rates? CMS would give a hearty cheer if these new technologies reduce as promised the human-induced drivers of climate change.

However, the report commissioned by the Convention, together with the African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement, the International Renewable Energy Agency and BirdLife International, explains the prudent reaction from conservationists, as it illustrates how renewable energies are a double-edged sword - a cure for some ills afflicting the world but with potentially severe side-effects for wildlife.

Hydro-power relies on dams - technological wonders in many cases - but essentially barriers across rivers preventing migratory species such as salmon from reaching their spawning grounds. The changes to water flow and levels both up and downstream of the dams can drastically transform habitats. The human inhabitants displaced when their homes were flooded were given ample warning and compensation; not so the wildlife.y

Wind power is harnessed through turbines, which take a huge toll of wildlife through collisions. The rotor blades of wind turbines are responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of bats and birds a year, to the detriment of the ecological services these useful insectivores provide by devouring as many as 1,000 mosquitoes a night, reducing the need to use chemical pesticides.

The construction, operation and maintenance of turbines are also negative factors, especially in marine wind farms - noise whirring of the rotors can all disturb whale and dolphin species which are particularly sensitive to sound.

Biomass production leads to habitat loss and degradation affecting birds and terrestrial mammals. Large plantations lead to monocultures and a loss of habitat diversity and thus reduce the number of species that a given area can support.

Solar, wave and tidal power similarly have their drawbacks, but the guidelines accompanying the report point the way to constructing renewable energy installations in ways that eliminate or at least reduce their impacts on migrating mammals such as birds, dolphins, porpoises and fish and their habitats.

There is no silver bullet to deliver a perfect solution to the problems of our growing demand for energy and of producing it in ways that do not damage the environment in one form or another. Renewables provide many of the answers but they need to be deployed sensitively and not indiscriminately, so that our efforts to keep the atmosphere clean and planet cool do not come at a price that our wildlife cannot afford to pay.

Bradnee Chambers is Executive Secretary of the UNEP Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals
3 from Nature's December 2013 Special Issue on coasts & sea level.

Public Release: 4-Dec-2013
Humans threaten wetlands' ability to keep pace with sea-level rise
Left to themselves, coastal wetlands can withstand rapid levels of sea-level rise. But humans could be sabotaging some of their best defenses, according to a Nature review paper published Thursday from from the Virginia Institute of Marine Science and the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center.

Public Release: 4-Dec-2013
Sea level rise and shoreline changes are lead influences on floods from tropical cyclones
Writing in the current special issue of Nature dedicated to coastal regions, UMass Amherst geoscientist Woodruff, with co-authors Jennifer Irish of Virginia Tech University and Suzana Camargo of Columbia University, say, "Society must learn to live with a rapidly evolving shoreline that is increasingly prone to flooding from tropical cyclones."

Public Release: 4-Dec-2013
Sea-level rise to drive coastal flooding, regardless of changes in hurricane activity
Clamor about whether climate change will cause increasingly destructive tropical storms may be overshadowing a more unrelenting threat to coastal property -- sea-level rise -- according to a team of researchers writing in the journal Nature this week.


Posted by: Rachel Smolker <>


My Privacy...

Wednesday, October 22, 2014

[biofuelwatch] Man Killed in Accident at Drax Biomass Plant in Louisiana

Man Killed in Accident at Drax Biomass Plant in Louisiana

Posted by: Josh Schlossberg <>


Yahoo Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:

My Privacy...

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

[Biofuelwatch] Action alert! Tell the Green Investment Bank: don't fund MGT Power's huge biomass plant!

Action alert! Tell the Green Investment Bank: don't fund MGT Power's huge biomass plant!

View this email in your browser


Please join us in telling the Green Bank not to fund MGT Power's Tees biomass power station

Take part here!

The Green Investment Bank (GIB) is celebrating its 2nd birthday next week, and we've called for a protest to coincide with it. Thanks to your help, our recent campaigns to stop the GIB financing the big-biomass power stations at Avonmouth, Grangemouth, and Rosyth have been successful, with the GIB having refrained from funding any of these projects so far.

But the battle to end the GIB's investments in big biomass and waste incineration continue: our next aim is to make sure that the GIB doesn't step in to save MGT Power and their consented 300MW power station on Teesside, which, if built, will be over four times bigger than the current largest dedicated biomass plant in the UK and swallow up a massive 2.7 million tonnes of woodchip a year (roughly 5 million tonnes of green wood) - that's equivalent to half of the UK's annual wood production! Most of this though will be imported from North America where highly-biodiverse wetland forests and old-growth woodland are under threat from the biomass electricity industry.

We can't allow the Green Bank to use public funds to support this scheme. The Department for Energy and Climate Change have already guaranteed MGT Power up to £190 million a year in subsidies if the plant is built, but the plant can't go ahead unless it attracts millions more in finance. The GIB could hold the key to making this happen - please support us in calling for the GIB to steer clear of MGT Power.

For more information on our GIB campaigns, please see Banking on Big Biomass.

GIB birthday protest: please join us in London on the 28th October to mark the Green Investment Bank's 2 years of dirty investments in Biomass and Waste for Energy. Biofuelwatch and the London Biomassive are hosting an alternative street party - with cake!
2014 Biofuelwatch Get in touch:

My Privacy...